Weighing Benefits and Costs of International Sanctions Against Iran

            Sanctions against Iran have been imposed through Executive Orders and legislation

in the United States; resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council; andactions taken by foreign governments. Different sets of sanctions rely on different criteria, guidelines, and implementation vehicles. They also aim at a variety of outcomes,including achieving a negotiated agreement on Iran’s nuclear program; restricting Iran’sability to acquire materials for that program; slowing the development of Iran’s nuclearprogram; ensuring that Iran discontinues funding of Hezbollah and Hamas; requiring Iran to respect the human rights of its citizens; limiting Iran’s ability to exert infuence in the region; and, for some in Washington, producing a change in Iran’s government(regime change or a fundamental change in the Iranian government’s policy and orien-tation), although this latter objective has been disavowed by the U.S. government. The sanctions regime also includes a complicated mix of criteria and provisions for lifting or easing the sanctions currently in place, should that be warranted by Iranian actions...

 

            We believethe United States might be better able to gauge and maximize the effectiveness of recent sanctions if the objectives that are most relevant and pressing today could be disentangled from other objectives that have been linked with sanctions...